Archive for History

Censorship: continuation

A few years ago there were a few “scandals” about censorship in my home country. I will use them as examples in a further discussion about censorship.

My stand point is that we should censor as little as possible/not white wash history, but I do also recognize the right of a creator/owner of things. In the previous post I mentioned Puerto Rico and said that it is about slavery and creating a successful colony (I think I mentioned both). I also pointed out that the “workers” are referred to as colonizers, but that it is actually slaves. I still think that I am right about but what I want to say is that Andreas Seyfarth, the creator of the game, is not wrong in calling them colonizers, the workers that is. Why do I think so? Because he made the game and is therefore entitled to call them whatever he wants, it is his right as the creator. And for all intents and purposes the game won’t function differently if the “workers” are called slaves or colonizers, since the focus isn’t on them.

Now let us look on the “scandals”.

Number 1: Tintin i Kongo (Tintin in the Congo)

The first one is the weirdest one I think, well maybe not. Tintin is comic that was made by Herge (or Georges Prosper Remi if you want his real name) during 1929-83. Tintin in the Congo was released first in 1931 as a black and white comic and then later, 1946, in color. It was released during a time when the portrayal of black people, done by white people, wasn’t all that positive or kind (or in a more frank term, racist). But during that time in our history, European/western, that kind of portrayal of wasn’t something uncommon. It was the norm. So when they did a rerelease of it in my home country they put a disclaimer in the beginning of the book saying; this is a product of its time; we do not support depiction of black people in it. (Said in more well articulated and sophisticated way)

I think this is the right way to do it. For one, the creator isn’t alive so they can’t ask him if it is okay to change parts of the product. Secondly, they explain that they don’t think the portrayal is acceptable in today’s society, but it is a part of history. History shouldn’t be changed. It would probably be a bigger “crime” to change it just because it doesn’t fit in to our view of the world.

Number 2: Kalle Ankas jul (Donald Duck’s Christmas)

This is once again something that has to do with history and how it was back in time far, far away. In Donald Duck’s Christmas special that is shown each Christmas Eve, there is a part when the viewers get to see Santa preparing the presents before starting his journey.

Here is the complete version of it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1KDhYWly04

The version shown during Christmas Eve is shortened, and “recently”, 2-3 years ago, it was edited again. 3:23-3:35 is removed and another part which I can’t remember was removed. When this happened, some people were furious in my home country. Saying that we aren’t allowed to express any kind of opinion, that the Political Correctness Police was bearing down on society and that the end of the world was near… okey, they didn’t say that the world was going to end but from some peoples’ reaction it just might have. Also, “everyone” started blaming the wrong people. They thought it was the governments TV-company that was behind it when it was actually the creators, Disney who changed it. Disney changed it because they felt it was inappropriate to show a cartoon with negative stereotypes, a cartoon meant for families to gather together and watch during Christmas celebration. I fully understand stand why they changed it and it is there right to change it since they are the owners of the piece. The same applies to the last “scandal”.

Number 3: Pippi Långstrump (Pippi Longstocking)

This is the most recent one of the three. What happened was that one or two of the Pippi Longstocking movies were changed a little, by cutting out the part when Pippi says her dad lives on a south pacific island and is a “neger kung (negro king)”, since he was the leader of the native population. This is very much a product of its era, since Astrid Lindgren, the creator of Pippi was a strong anti-racist advocate. But when she wrote it, it was the norm of the time to use the n-word about black people. But as I said, they changed it, and the people responsible for changing it were the owners/caretakers of the Pippi Longstocking property. So it is in their right to do that.

So well… I still think that you should try to keep things as they were, so we can look back and see how things were back then. However, it is important that a creator have control over their own creations.

Advertisements

Leave a comment »